Skip to main content
Changes in Salivary Flow and Oral pH After Mouthrinse Use
Changes in Salivary Flow and Oral pH After Mouthrinse Use

Full Title: Changes in Salivary Flow and Oral pH Following Use of Different Mouthrinse Formulations in Addition to Brushing Versus Brushing Only

Authors: Kimberly Milleman, RDH, PhD,Mary Lynn Bosma, RDH, DDS, AAS, Atsushi Saito, DDS, PhD, Patricia Gorecki, DMD, PhD, MOralSurg, Yang Ding, MSc, Urmila Lanka, MBBS, Alicia DelSasso, CCRP, Kaylie Wills, BSc, Jeffery Milleman, DDS, MPA

JDH Issue: April 2026

Program Track: Research

Abstract: Purpose: Mouthrinses contain inactive ingredients (e.g., solvents, such as alcohol) and active ingredients (e.g., antimicrobials, such as essential oils [EOs]) that work in combination to control gingival inflammation and regulate the oral microbiome. The purpose of this one-day, examiner-blind, randomized, parallel-group-controlled clinical trial was to understand the effect of different EO-containing mouthrinses, with and without alcohol, on salivary flow and pH. Methods: Subjects aged =18 years were recruited to participate in a one-day trial conducted at an independent research center. Salivary flow and pH were measured following a regimen of brushing and rinsing with an EO-containing mouthrinse versus brushing and rinsing with a water rinse control (BW). Eligible participants were assigned 1:1:1:1 to the BW group or one of three EO-containing mouthrinse groups. Change in salivary flow and pH after a single use of an EO-containing mouthrinse compared to the BW group was assessed at 0 (salivary flow only), then at 2.5, 5, 10, 15, and 30 minutes. Results: A total of 159 subjects completed the clinical trial. At 30 minutes following the intervention, the mean salivary flow was similar across all groups. The mean salivary pH increased in all groups through 15 minutes before returning to near-baseline levels by 30 minutes (all of which were within the normal oral pH range of 6.2–7.6). No adverse events were reported. Conclusion: The inclusion of alcohol in the tested mouthrinse formulations did not affect salivary flow or pH compared with the alcohol-free mouthrinses, indicating that a single use of either an alcohol-containing or alcohol-free EO-containing mouthrinse does not contribute to oral dryness. Future trials investigating the long-term use of mouthrinses and their effect on salivary flow and pH will help to build on the current evidence base and inform clinical decision-making.

Learning Objectives:

  • Explain the short term effects of essential oil (EO)–containing mouthrinses on salivary flow and oral pH compared with brushing alone.
  • Compare the effects of alcohol containing and alcohol free EO mouthrinse formulations on salivary function.
  • Interpret the clinical implications of study findings related to xerostomia risk and mouthrinse recommendations.

CE Credit Hours: 2.0

The American Dental Hygienists' Association is designated as an approved provider by the American Academy of Dental Hygiene, Inc. #AADHADH (Jan. 1, 2026–Dec. 31, 2026). Approval does not imply acceptance by a state or provincial Board of Dentistry. Licensee should maintain this document in the event of an audit.

The American Dental Hygienists’ Association is an approved provider of dental continuing education as recognized by the Dental Board of California, Provider #5238.

Discounted member price: 15.00
60.00
You could save: 75.0%